Research on technology and modeling of pipe bending in a pipe bender
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37142/2076-2151/2025-1(54)177Keywords:
pipe, bending, pipe bender, mandrel, modeling, QForm, corrugation, bending radius.Abstract
Polisan I., Hubskyi S., Kolisnyk K., Chukhlib V., Khodyriev H. Research on technology and modeling of pipe bending in a pipe bender
The article studies the technology of pipe bending and the influence of different shaft diameters on the formation of corrugations of the internal cross-section of the pipe. In the course of the work, an analysis of different pipe materials and their physical and mechanical properties was carried out, since the choice of material significantly affects bending. The calculation of the technological process of bending was performed for different bending angles and wall thicknesses. The Fusion 360 software package was used to visualize and analyze the process. Modeling has shown that the main factor that affects the bending capacity of the pipe during mandrel bending is the relationship between the bending radius and the diameter of the pipe. As a result of the investigation, it was established that when the bending radius changes to 50 mm, corrugation and ovalization critically increases. To remove clear spots of small radius, it is necessary to use a special mandrel to ensure a change in corrugation and ovalization of the finished product.The modeling was carried out in the specialized QForm program. This allowed obtaining graphical dependences of average stresses and stress intensity. The dependence of bending quality on the geometric parameters of the equipment was established and the need to use mandrel mechanisms for small bending radii was substantiated.
References
Tim Tronvoll, Jian Ma, Torgeir Welo. Deformation behavior in tube bending: a comparative study of compression bending and rotary draw bending. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2023. Vol. 124. P. 801–816.
Miller G. G. Tube Forming Processes: A Comprehensive Guide. Dearborn, Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2003. P. 30–50.
Biba N., Stebunjov S. QForm: simulation of metal forming processes. 2018.
Tronvoll S. A., Ma J., Welo T. Deformation behavior in tube bending: a comparative study of compression bending and rotary draw bending. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2023. Vol. 124. P. 801–816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10638-9.
Singh H. Fundamentals of Hydroforming. Dearborn, Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2003. P. 60–87.
Guo X. Flexible Metal Forming Technologies: Principles, Process and Equipment. Singapore: Springer, 2022. P. 123–250.
Yu T., Xue P. Introduction to Engineering Plasticity: Fundamentals with Applications in Metal Forming, Limit Analysis and Energy Absorption. Singapore: Springer, 2022. P. 60–145.
Kakandikar G. M., Agrawal A., Ravi Kumar D. Metal Forming Processes: Developments in Experimental and Numerical Approaches. Singapore: Springer, 2022. P. 170–200.
Tube Life: London's Underground in Photographs. Mirrorpix, 2018. P. 10–100.
Marciniak Z., Duncan J. L., Hu S. J. Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002. P. 100–150.
Altan T., Tekkaya A. E. Sheet Metal Forming: Processes and Applications. Materials Park: ASM International, 2012.
Jiang Z., Yang H., Li H., Ren N. Theoretical investigation on the springback of thin-walled tube in rotary draw bending. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2011. Vol. 53, No. 10. P. 872–882.
Heng L., Yang H., Zhang H., Li G. Deformation behaviors of thin-walled tube in rotary draw bending under push assistant loading. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2011. Vol. 211, No. 3. P. 373–384.
Mentella A., Strano M. Rotary draw bending of small diameter copper tubes: Predicting the cross-section deformation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2012. Vol. 226, No. 2. P. 267–278.
Tang N. C. Plastic-deformation analysis in tube bending. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2000. Vol. 77, No. 12. P. 751–759.